Three issues will dominate medicine in the next century:
accelerated oxidative injury (oxidosis), abnormal cellular oxygen metabolism
("dysoxygenosis"), and an integrative view of the human microecologic cellular
and macroecologic tissue-organ systems. And that medicine will grow under Darwin's glow.
Among the ecologic shifts, oxidosis and dysoxygenosis will be the core issues in
basic and clinical research. Integration of empirical and experimental observations will
be the mainstay of all therapeutic strategies. Prediction is a risky business; still,
those three predictions seem entirely safe.
The health/dis-ease/disease continuum is a spectrum of
energetic-molecular dynamics. The enormous healing potential of spiritual surrender and
certain energetic phenomena is well known to all astute observers in medicine. Only those
who limit their work to mechanistic aspects of illness and have little, if any, passion
for healing question the role of spiritual and energetic phenomena in clinical medicine.
However, technology sufficiently sensitive to measure subtle energy fields - and molecular
and cellular resonances created in them - is not yet forthcoming. Thus, as far as
observable and reproducible phenomena are concerned, we are left with the molecular
components of the energetic-molecular healing phenomena, the two dominant concerns being
oxidosis and dysoxygenosis.
What do alpine meadows of Yosemite National Park, piney woods
of South Carolina, and plains of Laramie, Wyoming, have in common? Answer: The warm
summers there are unusually hushed. The reason for this is that the frog population in
those areas - and many others in the world - has been decimated. By some estimates, up to
a third of the nation's amphibians - frogs, toads, and salamanders-have disappeared.1
In 1988, in Costa Rica on a Monteverde ridge, half of the 40 amphibian species simply
vanished. Some wags have speculated that those amphibians were stolen by aliens - a global
whodunit!
In Chesapeake Bay, during some summers, nearly all
Eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) are parasitized by dermo (Perkinsus
marinus), which causes severe systemic acidosis. Up to one-half of the
total population succumbs.2 Similarly, grass shrimp (Palaemonetes
pugio) suffer from
heavy parasitic infestation by epicardean isopods (Probopyrus pandalicola).3 In Alaska, ten
years after one of the largest oil spills in history, the Valdez accident, species which
have failed to recover include the common loon, cormorant, harbor seal, harlequin duck,
and pigeon guillemot.4 In the Pacific island of Guam, the introduction of some alien
species, most notably a brown tree snake, has fundamentally transformed communities of
birds, mammals, and lizards during the past 50 years.5 Extinction of 22 native terrestrial vertebrate species has been
attributed to ecologic relationships among the especially versatile introduced predators
and the naive native prey. Such reports often spark academic debates in the small world
community of ecologists. Sometimes, such news also stimulates dinner-table conversation in
a few households. But, amazingly, the obvious relevance of such reports to human health
receives little, if any, attention.
Enter Charles Darwin. He was the first systematic integrationist.
The essence of his life's work was integration of seemingly incongruous observations
concerning natural phenomena into some meaningful whole. His seminal ideas of strife for
resources, adaptation to changing environments, and natural selection could not have
germinated except in the "soil of ecologic thinking." The genocide of frogs,
oysters, shrimp, and other life forms can be understood only when peering through Darwin's
microscope.
Oxidosis and Dysoxygenosis
In 1983, based on a chance reflection on why stale
buffers lose some of their buffering capacity, the author was puzzled as to why butter
turns rancid spontaneously but rancid butter does not turn unrancid spontaneously. Fruit
on a kitchen table spoils spontaneously but spoiled fruit does not unspoil spontaneously.
Unmindful of the evident relevance of the second law of thermodynamics to those questions,
he put forth his hypothesis that spontaneity of oxidation in nature is the primary driving
force in molecular and cellular injury, and hence of aging and all disease
processes.6 That simple idea has preoccupied him ever since. Subsequent high-resolution
microscopic and biochemical studies led to the conclusion that a state of accelerated
oxidative molecular injury (oxidosis) is the core pathogenetic mechanism involved
in initiating and perpetuating environmental illness,7 chronic fatigue syndrome,8 ischemic coronary artery disease,9 altered states of bowel ecology,10 arrested growth in
children given chemotherapy and/or immunosuppressant steroid therapy,11 amenorrhea
and oligomenorrhea in chronic fatigue syndrome,12 and other disorders.13
Those investigations made it abundantly clear that the three core
molecular deviations that separate a state of health from that of absence of health as
well as disease states are oxidosis, dysoxygenosis, and acidosis. Next, attempts to
integrate those molecular dynamics with clinically recognizable patterns of oxidative
injury to human microecologic cellular and macroecologic tissue-organ systems culminated
in the following three concepts:
1. Oxidative regression to primordial cellular
ecology plays a role in the pathogenesis of diverse entities, such as chronic fatigue
syndrome and cancer.14
2.. Oxidative-dysoxygenative dysfunction (ODD) plays
the core pathogenetic role in chronic disorders affecting all organ-systems of the
body, such as chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and Gulf War syndrome.15
3. A clinical model of the microecologic cellular
and macroecologic tissue-organ systems designated The Pyramid of the Trios of Human
Ecosystems provides a framework for successful therapeutic strategies16
Too much oxidation and too little oxygen - those are
the molecular clues to the case of the missing toads. Frog corpses were found decomposed
or eaten, but the cause of death remained elusive. A partial answer to the mystery was
provided by Australian, American, and Canadian researchers last year. The culprit, they
reported, was not an alien, but a lowly fungus belonging to the genus Chytridiomycota.17
Significantly, the prior rap sheet of this fungus shows it to infect plants and insects,
not frogs. How does the fungus, which affects the frogs' skin, kill them? The
investigators believe the fungus suffocates frogs by clogging their skin pores through
which they breathe. It seems likely that the fungus not only mechanically blocked oxygen
transport but also caused severe oxidative injury in frogs, as fungi do in humans.18
In California, pesticides were reported to be the villains. How do
pesticides kill? By poisoning respiratory enzymes of insects. It so turns out that some of
those enzymes, such as cholinesterase, are identical to the human cholinesterases. What
robs insects of their oxygen supply also suffocates human microecologic cellular systems.
In Chesapeake Bay, during summer months the water oxygen content
drops and acidity rises steeply due to heavily contaminated effluent from hog farms
draining into coastal marshes. That causes the oxygen-deprived Eastern oysters to lose
their immune resistance to the dermo parasite. The aquatic life which succumbed to the
Valdez spill also died the same way: too much oxidative stress, too little oxygen.
The Case for Ecologic Integration
The ideas of ecologic integrity - and, more
recently, sustainability - are "hot" issues for ecologists and
environmentalists.19 Darwin guides them well. In clinical medicine, howe ver, critically
important disruptions of the human micro- and macroecosystems are seldom, if ever,
addressed. It is as if Darwin never lived for the general physician community. A case in
point: It is not uncommon for the author to find 80 to 90% of phagocytes in the blood
smears of elderly patients with circulatory disorders to be well-preserved and actively
motile. By contrast, 30 to 60% of phagocytes in children with recurrent infections and
repeated courses of antibiotics are often inactive and/or disintegrated. The yeast-like
anaerobes in the peripheral blood infect the phagocytic cells and kill them. The predator
then becomes the prey. Tales of the brown tree snake in Guam fascinate us, but the matter
of human hunter immune cells becoming the hunted escapes our notice. Antibiotic abuse
persists.
The case for integration in medicine is equally
compelling, though rejected to date by the general physician community in the United
States. Notwithstanding some impressive gains (such as the recent inaugural graduation of
the nation's first university of integrative medicine20), most physicians still find the term integrative medicine
unsettling. Old prejudices die hard. But, integration in medicine is not merely playing
Tantaric Indian music while doing an unnecessary coronary bypass operation, nor is it
adding acupuncture after spinal fusion surgery has failed to relieve backache. Integration
in medicine must be philosophic before it can be clinical.21
While prestigious medical journals continue to
deride or resist integrative nondrug therapies,22 the world community of biologists is eagerly seeking integration
with physicists, mathematicians, and computer scientists to solve problems they recognize
cannot be solved with the prevailing reductionistic model. Indeed, Science recently
addressed the need for an "integrative agenda" for reaching beyond reductionism
in science,23 and devoted a large part of its April 2, 1999, issue to the theme (and need)
of integration among the various scientific disciplines to advance our understanding of
complex systems in nature.
Seashell Fossils and Petrified Pine Trees
On July 22, 1834, HMS Beagle reached
Valpariaso Bay on the Pacific coast of South America. Darwin promptly hired a mule and was
off to "unravel the mystery" of the Andes.30 During his travels on his "fine chaos of mountains" of
the Cordilleras, he made two important observations. At the height of 12,000 feet, he
found fossil seashells. On his way down, at 7,000 feet, he discovered petrified pine trees
embedded in marine rock. The trees, he reasoned, had once stood on the Atlantic coast,
were sunk beneath the sea, then raised to 7,000 feet as the Andes rose from the ocean
floor. Robert FitzRoy, the captain of the Beagle, was not impressed by Darwin's
reasoning. He held on to his (then prevailing) view that the mountains stood as they were
created on the day of creation. He seemed to have little use for Darwin's notion of
relatedness of his two finds and the relevance of the two to his notion of the origin of
the Andes.
Thousands of papers are written each year to report the research
findings about ulcerative colitis, Crohn's colitis, collagenous colitis, microscopic
colitis, and other types of colitis. The essential issue in such research should be ecologic
disruptions which set the stage for the various morphologic patterns of the
inflammatory process. Amazingly, that essential issue is totally ignored in such
papers. Articles after articles describe histologic lesions and laboratory abnormalities
encountered in patients with colitis and promote the use of one or more drug regimens
containing steroids to suppress symptoms. Regrettably, a growing number of
gastroenterologists now prescribe immunosuppressant drugs such as 6-MP and cyclosporine.
The author does not see any papers which delve deep into the nature of ecologic
relationships among the causative factors. Surprisingly, the approach to ecologic
problems of the bowel continues to be in line with FitzRoy's fixed view of the Andes
rather than the evolving, ecologic concepts of Darwin.
Resistance to Integration
The resistance of the general medical community to integration in
clinical medicine is difficult to understand. Recent advances in molecular biology and
genetics clearly demonstrate that human molecular dynamics and healing responses are
exceedingly complex. In light of such advances, the prevailing notions of
one-disease/one-diagnosis/one-drug are neither defendable on theoretical basis nor on
empirical grounds. Consider the following examples of ecologic relationships and
complexity in biologic systems:
It is now evident that the imminent conquest of the
human genome, though establishing the identity of 100,000 or more genes, is far from a
complete victory. We know that expression of individual genes is not merely a "gene
matter." Gene expression in most cases requires participation of five or more
proteins.24
The dynamics of viral infectivity and pathogenicity
are far more complex than previously thought. For instance, five genes which promote
replication of some bacteriophages within the bacterial bodies are, in turn, controlled by
six other genes, four of which function as promoters while the remaining two encourage
dormancy. But the story does not end there. The complexity of viral replication further
grows when we recognize that one gene that favors dormancy (C1) feedbacks to
amplify its own expression while diminishing the output of the gene (Cro) that
triggers immediate viral replication.24
The chemotactic motility of Escherichia coli is
triggered when an attractant molecule binds with one of its many Che (for
chemotaxis) membrane receptor proteins. For decades, such motility was thought to depend
on precise titration of the various molecular components of the system. Studies with
mutant E. coli which either grossly overproduce or markedly underproduce Che
proteins show that following an initial period of altered chemotactic motility, mutant
microbes expediently return to patterns of motility of non-mutant microbes, thus negating
the old concepts of fixed roles of genes, their protein products, and functionality.25 The sameness
and variability of even simple microbial behavior defy reductionistic notions.
The author's purpose in citing the above biologic phenomena is to
show that the dominant one-disease/one-diagnosis/one-drug (the
one-cause/one-effect/one-solution) mode of the prevailing medical dogma is not tenable in
light of advances in molecular biology and genetics in recent decades. Indeed, it is
astonishing how prestigious medical journals continue to hold that blinded single-drug
trials conducted for brief periods of weeks and months can provide reliable long-term
solutions to disruptions of astoundingly complex microecologic cellular and macroecologic
tissue-organ systems of the human body, both in health and disease.
A case in point: the author and his colleagues have
shown that coronary artery heart disease results from an ecologic disruption of the
circulating blood. Microclot and microplaque formation occurs in the circulating
blood as a part of the spectrum of changes of oxidative coagulopathy.2 Just as a water
pump pumping clean water functions well, a blood pump pumping clean blood can be expected
to function well. Evidence for that view has been published.26 Integrative management protocols employed by the author and his
colleagues that focus on ecologic aspects of the blood ecosystem and prevent oxidative
coagulopathy (without resorting to drug therapies for blockade of adrenergic receptors or
calcium channels of cardiac myocytes) produced excellent clinical results (complete
control of symptoms and discontinuance of all drugs in 61% and more than 75% reduction in
symptoms and dosage of drugs in another 17% in patients with advanced coronary heart
disease).26
Now consider what happens when the essential
ecologic issues are ignored and purely mechanical approaches are adopted for clearly
ecologic problems. The reported rates of closure of coronary arteries within six months of
balloon angioplasty are in the range of forty to fifty percent.27 In recent years, there has been a staggering increase in the use of
coronary stents.28 Predictably, such stents failed to address any of the ecologic
issues involved. The following quote from an editorial published in the December 3, 1998,
issue of The New England Journal of Medicine (pages 1702-3) is illuminating:
"Cardiologists have mistakenly believed that stenting reduced
the incidence of death and myocardial infarction. However, careful examination of the
results of randomized trials comparing stenting with balloon angioplasty, including the
results of trials by Erbel et al. shows an excess number of deaths and myocardial
infarction among patients assigned to stents."
An important point not included in the above quote
is that such dismal results are obtained not with just one stenting procedure but with an
average insertion of 1.7 stents.29
Gulf War Syndrome--Darwin Was Ignored, But at What Cost?
What can we make of over 100,000 young men and women who went to the
Gulf War in good health but over nine years later are still partially or totally disabled?
The Gulf War syndrome is dismissed as an all-in-the-head syndrome by many. Anyone who
believes that there is nothing demonstrably wrong in Gulf War syndrome should take a drop
of blood from a patient and study it with high-resolution phase-contrast microscopy. He
will find advanced evidence of oxidative coagulopathy. The Gulf War was a grand experiment
in human biology to see how much cumulative oxidative stress people can take before their
redox defenses break down. It was the first true virtual war in which fighting men and
women were shown the potential for devastation over and over again. There was widespread
fear of poisoning by chemical warfare and of risk of mutilation and death caused by the
Star Wars technology. Soldiers were administered antidote for war poisons that were known
to cause nerve-muscle injury. They were exposed to massive amounts of pesticides and toxic
chemicals in war materials. Dead cattle were found in fields, raising concerns of
biological warfare. The hot days and cold nights of the desert increased rates of
outgasing. Finally, there were the oil fields put to torch. Chemical toxins that went up
with smoke had to come down. So it was that the total cumulative oxidative stress on over
700,000 soldiers in that war far exceeded any recorded before. Darwin should have been the
scientist to guide us in how to assess ecologic damage sustained by the men and women
in harm's way. What actually happened was astonishing. All ecologic issues were
ignored. Instead, the ill veterans were prescribed symptom-suppressing antidepressants
and anxiolytics without searching for the underlying molecular and cellular basis of
symptomatology. Their battered bowel, blood, and liver ecosystems were neglected. The
obsolete one-disease/one-diagnosis/one-drug model prevailed.
Gulf War syndrome was chalked up to post-stress syndrome, the old
all-in-the-head standby. It was as if the Gulf region ecosystems did not exist. It was as
if the bowel, blood, and liver ecosystems did not exist in the bodies of the sick
veterans. It was as if ecologic relationships in nature do not matter, as if Darwin never
lived. Gulf War syndrome was ignored. But, at what cost?
Genes Are Not the Only Alphabets of Biology
Genes make up the language of biology, but only in limited ways. The
preoccupation of a student of biology - and of human health - should not be merely with
numeration of genes, but with how genes integrate with their protein products as
well as the membrane receptors and the ligands that trigger their expression. The known
dynamics of ligand-receptor-gene-product proteins are mind-numbing in their complexity.
Genes are components of those strings of life (molecular ecosystems), not their
beginnings, not their ends. Compared with gene dynamics in viruses and bacteria, those in
humans in health and disease are mystifyingly complex. Thus, the prevailing notions of
one-cause/one-effect/one-solution in clinical medicine are too simplistic to be taken
seriously.
Mapping of the human genome, it seems to the author, is like
learning the Urdu alphabet. Can one claim to understand Ghalib simply because he knows the
Urdu alphabets? (Ghalib is considered the most transcendent poet in both Urdu and English
in the eyes of many who know both languages. A Goethe reader might say the same about the
German alphabets.) Elegant poetry is not merely the joy of individual words finding new
meanings but also such words giving luminescence to words that precede and follow them. It
is the same way with genes. Deciphering the human genome will be a hollow victory unless
it brings forth a deeper understanding of how genes self-regulate, speak to each other,
listen to each other, influence each other, and integrate with each other for the
good of the whole being.
Darwin's Work Is Now Author's Work
Darwin's work, the author recognizes, is now his (author's) work.
Darwin's larger message is clear. It is as relevant to us as to his inches on the
Galapagos Islands. No human suffering can be understood except through clear concepts of
interrelatedness among the human microecologic cellular and macroecologic tissue-organ
systems as well as the ecosystems in which humans live. The nineteenth-century
one-disease/one-diagnosis/one-drug models of illness simply are irrelevant to the dominant
chronic disorders of the twenty-first century, e.g., coronary heart disease (clearly a
disorder of the blood ecosystem), inflammatory bowel disease and colitis (evidently states
of the battered bowel ecosystem), and the fatigue-fibromyalgia complex (undoubtedly a
disorder of the disrupted bowel, blood, and liver ecosystems), and so on. Darwin continues
to illuminate the author's clinical work and will undoubtedly govern the principles and
practice of medicine in the new century.